雅思作文应该如何布局?

雅思作文应该如何布局?

雅思考试经验总结

雅思作文TASK 2:Some countries achieve international sporting success by building specialized facilities that can be only used to train top athletes instead of providing facilities that everyone can use. Is this a positive or negative development?

某些國家以便获得国际性比赛的取得成功,只出示顶级选手训炼的专业机器设备,而并不是出示每个人皆能应用的体育设备,你觉得它是个好還是不太好的发展趋势?

分析:

2019年的考试题发展趋势: 老题翻修 新题非常少(2016. 2.27/ 10.13) 题目頻率稳控.果真,本次考试题是2014年7月10号的原题,归属于政府部门层面类,通常涉及到该类话题讨论,基础是有关政府部门掏钱投资类的方位,例如政府部门付学杂费,政府部门针对诊疗、造型艺术的项目投资,或是维护民居建筑等,本题关键考虑的是政府部门针对体育竞赛的项目投资,是紧紧围绕一小部分還是施惠于大家.

这道题型是“优缺点类”话题讨论,最好是选用多边探讨的方式,即谈“利”和“弊”,随后得出自身的倾向性.

构造: 延用我一惯倡导的A+(适用面) B+/B-(对立明确提出1个见解,随后开展辩驳)的构造方式

P1: 导入话题讨论+观点( drawbacks outweigh the benefits)

P2: 弊(适用面):

Excessive investment in training elite sportsmen might have more demerits in the long run.

sponsored by taxpayers while they usually have no free access to those facilities, and they are likely to experience a sense of disappointment

‚ demotivate the public to be keen on sports

P3: 利(对立):

Nurturing more exceptional professional players exerts a positive impact on improving a nation’s status in the international arena. A nation with great competitiveness in sports is more likely to stand out in the world.

However, the government should not trade its fellow citizens’ well-being for such prestige. The great expenditure should have been take better advantage of to improve the domestic infrastructure which brings tangible benefits to citizens.

P4: 小结文章正文,重申立场

政府部门类相近话题讨论也有给出:

1, 探讨政府部门是不是该为大家诊疗付钱

Some people believe that governments should pay for healthcare, while others say that it is not the government’s responsibility. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

此题提干展现的是“政府部门该为大家诊疗付钱”和“为大家诊疗开支付钱并不是政府部门义务”这2个见解,在內容上面较为极端化和片面性.因此能够从“政府部门和本人应当相互担负医疗费”的见解下手,那麼行为主体段內容大概给出:

P2: Those who object to the government’s sponsorship for public healthcare must consider the state’s role in caring for its people.抵制國家支助诊疗的人,要充分考虑政府部门在照料人民层面的人物角色.

政府部门有义务出示尽量好的褔利(social welfare),对人民幸福快乐(well-being)而言,健康服务具备最本质的实际意义(be fundamental to)

P3: However, an individual in need of medical care should have realistic expectations of the government, and be prepared to bear some of the costs for their medical treatment.殊不知,必须诊疗协助的人最好是对政府部门有较为具体的期待,并提前准备好担负一部分花费.

政府部门沒有充足的钱(enough resources)为所有人出示免费医疗.

2, 探讨政府部门是不是该为大学教育付钱

Instead of asking the government to bear the cost of higher education, students should pay tuition fees themselves. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

此题提干涉及到来到是政府部门付高等职业教育花费還是大学生本人担负,关键字“higher education”,这一要留意,并不是中小学校的基础教育只是高等职业教育(不具备义务性),而且提及了2个行为主体,因此人们最好两侧探讨.观点站定在”本人担负“,行为主体语段大概內容给出:

P2: Students affording the tertiary educational expenses can avoid the waste of public resources.大学生担负高等职业教育花费能够防止公共资源网奢侈浪费.

免费教育(free access to education)将会是许多大学生不愿尽快进行学习培训(complete/finish the courses)和学生就业(enter the workforce)的1个缘故.

P3: Government covering the tuition fees can grant those students who are of low socio-economic status equal opportunities to receive university education. 政府部门付费能够给这种穷人家的小孩接纳大学教育的公平机遇.

例如,对读法律学或医药学(medical care)的大学生而言,念高校是1个价格昂贵的挑选(an expensive option).

殊不知,这种大学生终究在极少数(account for a small proportion),能够对这种大学生开展支助,可是不可以由于这一缘故就免大学费用


以上张老师为大家带来的就是关于雅思政府投资双边讨论的内容

你和雅思的故事 - Go Hard or Go Home

发表于 2019-09-11

雅思考试经验总结

雅思写作训练题型:

Some people say governments should give priority to health care, while others believe that taxpayers' money should be spent on other important priorities. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

题型类型:政府职能

提出问题方法:多边探讨
该难题归属于多边探讨,学生应当各自阐述政府部门适用发展趋势保健医疗和别的关键行业的缘故,随后比照作出自身的依据.还题型的见解還是很容易算出,仅仅学生们在阐述是要将逻辑顺序讲清,不必一上去却说能够推动社会发展和睦.

例文合理布局:

首段:明确提出见解,觉得政府部门应当把钱项目投资别的行业.
第四段:妥协段,认可资金投入诊疗有其有效的地方.
第三段:明确提出有别的的行业更必须政府部门的关心.
第四段:小结.

范文

The functions of governments come in an array of (许多,一连串) forms, among which health care is an indispensable facet (必不可少的层面) that governments have to pay attention to. In spite of its importance, I am of the opinion that there exit other aspects to which governments should attach weight (高度重视).
It is quite obvious that the people are inclined to (倾向性于) be less economically burdened if governments priotitise health care. This is because more favorable policies (有益的现行政策) will be issued and more fund will be granted to the public, which makes it more convenient and cost-effective for the public to see a doctor. For example, the financial support from governments is likely to make various medicines and treatments more affordable to people who are not so well-off(富有的). Compared with the situation where citizens have to bear the cost totally by themselves, the economical pressure will be much relieved.
However, governments' investment should not be confined within (局限性在…以内) the boundary of health care. Education, which concerns the long-term development of the whole nation, should also receive more funds. More talented students will be cultivated (塑造) due to the abundance of governments' financial support, offering more intellectual support (智商适用) to the development of the society. Besides, The students whose families are under the poverty line (处在贫苦的家中) are less likely to fail to receive further education only because of the insufficiency of tuition. Apart from education, it is alsoadvisable (有效的)that taxpayers' money should be distributed to public facilities, which will not benefit every citizen's daily life, but also attract more investment and create more job opportunities.
To sum up, the allotment (分派) of governments' funds can go to more sectors which will exert more influence on publics and the society as a whole, although the importance of health care cannot be underestimated.


以上范老师为大家带来的就是关于雅思政府投资双边讨论的内容

发表于 2019-09-11
在线咨询
IOS papers
wechat您有一条新的消息
麦考瑞雅思客服
请问您要考雅思A类还是G类?